Okay,
now I’m guilty of invoking some sensationalism by leading with the word “ghost”
instead of “spirit,” but in my years of teaching high school and college,
sometimes a dramatic turn of phrase or a good old slamming down of a textbook
on the desk to begin a lecture is the only thing to keep a listener awake.
In
simplistic terms, a “ghost” is the tangible manifestation of a dead person.
Some
scholars contend this manifestation to be the “soul” or literal “spirit” of the
deceased; others consider it to be a part of the person that has yet to “cross
over” into the realm of death. Either
way, both camps will agree that a “ghost” is considered a part of the deceased
that is detected in the world of the living.
The very nature of the idea also conjures up notions of the divine: the
two sides of that coin being, the angelic side, and the demonic side. If such a connection exists between ghosts
and an omnipotent force that is indeed beyond this world, “Angels” and “Demons”
would most certainly be classified as ethereal “spirits.”
I’m
not a religious man, not in any traditional sense, but I do believe in the
unknown – in the existence of “things” that may be beyond our normal human
understanding. Therefore, I cannot
discount the mystical or “divine” implications in such a belief system. If I am to subscribe into the existence of
spirits or ghosts, I must subscribe into the existence of “Angels” as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment